Scholarly l literature review

DNP850A week 2 Assignment:
Chapter Two
Provide an initial workup of Chapter Two and the project direction. Solidify your project topic and begin to think about strategies for conducting your inquiry. As you reflect on your immersion activities and feedback, you received during the first week, and potential project question that you would like to focus on for your project.

At this point, it is important to avoid firmly attaching yourself to specific details as there will still be considerable revisions based on the new knowledge you will obtain over the next few weeks.

The second chapter is a review of the literature, which attempts to sketch a wider pattern of similar scholarly activities, discussing prior studies and fitting the present project into a broader scheme. This is the most time-consuming and a key chapter for the rest of the project.

The literature review should be comprehensive and scholarly. You will complete an exhaustive review of the literature. You should have approximately thirty-five (35) references in this chapter that support your project.

Chapter Two defines what the current literature is on your topic and how you are filling a gap or adding to the body of knowledge. Do not let yourself get behind.

Be sure to focus on APA, grammar, word choice, and sentence structure. Your faculty mentor will grade each chapter and make recommendations for improvement. Please keep up with those recommendations and changes throughout the course. Chapter Two should be approximately 2500-3000 pages in length.

Use the most current edition of the APA Manual to complete all of your work in this course.

Assignment Expectations
Length: 2500 – 3000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment.
References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least thirty five (35) scholarly sources to support your claims
Key words:
-CAUTI bundle
-Quality improvement in acute rehab impatient
-Catherine associated urinary track infection (CAUTI)
-Hospital acquired infection (HAI)
-Morbidity and mortality rates in New York
-Mount Sinai Hospital related to CAUTIs
-urinary tract infections hospital acquired
-Medicare Medicaid reimbursement policy for CAUTI
-Decreasing CAUTI among acute care in hospital re-habilitation patients
-Using the plan -do -study- act (PDSA) model to reduce CAUTI in the hospital rehab units